When comparing Bazaar vs Mercurial, the Slant community recommends Mercurial for most people. In the question“What are the best version control systems?” Mercurial is ranked 2nd while Bazaar is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Mercurial is:
Mercurial is a more intuitive option than many of its competitors. The [documentation](https://mercurial.selenic.com/guide) is well organized and easy for beginners to read & understand.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
It is quick to learn, you don't need to memorize lot of commands to do your job.
Pro Tracking empty folders
With Bazaar you can track empty folders without the need to put .keep files in them.
Pro Full support for renaming
Renaming of a file is fully supported, not a hack like removing a file and adding back under another name...
Pro Easy to use
Mercurial is a more intuitive option than many of its competitors. The documentation is well organized and easy for beginners to read & understand.
Doesn't require access to a central repository, because each checkout is a full repository by itself.
Pro Free and open source
Mercurial is open source and free to use.
Mercurial is designed to make performing operations (such as commits, clones etc.) fast.
Pro Good documentation
Mercurial documentation covers everything from revision control system basics to mercurial specific features in a short and clear way.
Users can activate plugins to provide additional features.
Pro Same features Git provides, but much easier to use and to understand
The command-line interface is more intuitive, requiring much less memorization and exotic options/piping to achieve the same thing you would in git.
Pro Native Windows support
Native Windows support. No trace of cygwin or other dirty hacks typically found in competitors.
Pro Fully python based
Pro Doesn't delete history
Mercurial makes it pretty darn hard to delete history by mistake. In Git, if you mistakenly commit to HEAD and switch to a different branch, your commit is toast. Yes, you can dig through the reflog but most users don't even know of its existence and will wish they didn't once they find out.
Pro Actively contributed to by Facebook
Mercurial is actively contributed to by the developers at Facebook as they use it for their massive source repository.
Con Slow developement
Bazaar tends to have a slow update cycle with Canonical. Version 2.6 was released in August 2013 and branch 2.7 was not finished until Feb. 2016.
Con Complicated requirements
Con Lost the widely adopted race to git
Sharing code and projects in an open source world is a must and trying to working with multiple Source Code Control systems does not help the ecosystem.
Con Setup paths are hardcoded
Con Can't delete named branches
You pretty much have to use tags instead.
Con Feels limited from a Git user's perspective
E.g. it does not offer the ability to rebase/force-push your own feature branch.