When comparing Total.js vs Adonisjs, the Slant community recommends Adonisjs for most people. In the question“What are the best node.js web frameworks?” Adonisjs is ranked 2nd while Total.js is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose Adonisjs is:
If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro No dependencies
Which in other words means, a high performance solid core which provides you with a with a minimal (but stable) layer to build your app on.
Pro Websocket support
Up to date with Websocket RFC 6455.
Pro Automated compression
Minification and gzip compression is built in and automatic.

Pro Good documentation and examples
Often updated examples and well written documentation.
Pro Getting the things done efficiently without useless ceremony
Following and adding to Node.js the proven battle-tested paradigm implemented by Django, Laravel & ASP.NET MVC.
Pro Good support
Pro Really reactive community and developers on their Chat
Pro Working on all versions of the node.js
Pro Based on Laravel PHP Framework
If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis.
Pro Similar to Rails
Pro Built-in modules for everything
There are built-in modules for everything: Auth, Social Auth, mailing ect
Pro Has websocket support out of the box
Pro Very good documentation
Pro Easy to learn, especially if you're already familiar with Laravel
Pro Option for full-stack or api standalone implementation
You can choose to use the full-stack version or if you wish to build a RESTful API you can choose to use the api standalone version.
Cons
Con Developed only by one person
Framework is developed by only one person.
Con Paid support
Framework lacks any community, if you need support you are forced to buy support package from developer.
Con Best practices
This framework doesn't adhere to any best practices in software development.
Con Poor design
Framework is designed very poorly, autocomplete in IDEs don't work.
Con Poor documentation
Source code is very poorly documented, only available information is on the official website.
Con Prototype pollution
Con Node IDE support or Autocomplete
Con Poor performance
Con No NOSQL integration
Only used ORM, not ODM.
