When comparing Sails.js vs CaptainCasa Enterprise Client, the Slant community recommends Sails.js for most people. In the question“What is the best web application framework?” Sails.js is ranked 14th while CaptainCasa Enterprise Client is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Sails.js is:
Sails.js is built with a focus on building real time communication apps such as chat or multiplayer games, so naturally it has Socket.io extremely well supported.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Transparent support for Socket.io
Sails.js is built with a focus on building real time communication apps such as chat or multiplayer games, so naturally it has Socket.io extremely well supported.
Pro MVC architecture
This could be a huge plus, if you prefer to build your apps using the Model View Controller architecture. Using Sails.js you'll find the task of separating the business logic from the user interface and keeping the interactions between them in a separate layer, extremely easy.
Pro JSON API generated for free
Exposes public JSON API for free. No additional routing to be defined. Makes it pretty easy to access data from anywhere.
Pro ORM that can be plugged into any database, or even custom web service
Sails.js uses Waterline ORM at its backend which means you can store your data in any datastore that you like; all you have to do is make a change to the Waterline adapter, this will allow you to store your data in MySQL/Redis or any other kind of database.
Pro So easy to deploy and lift
Pro Great documentation and structure
Clear documentation and easy to understand. The file structure gives you a way to understand where you can start to develop when you encounter a new Sails project
Pro Easy clustering
Pro Very fast dialogs
Very fast even with many controls. CaptainCasa Enterprise client is much faster than Vaadin when writting similar programs.
Pro Fast and powerful
Pro Longlife framework
Pro CDI via EL
Separation of the backend code and the creation of the pages / Injection of the code (CDI) into the pages via expression language (EL).
Pro High security
Pro Server development with Java
No javascript is needed, everything is developed on the server with Java. Optimized roundtrip.
Pro Free use
Pro Good scalability
In addition to the extremely good performance, which already ensures that the system can be scaled well, clustering of the system is already provided for in the software architecture.
Cons
Con Poor ORM
The built-in Waterline is not well designed and is not suitable for production environments. Populating more than 1 level deep is a nightmare, there is no transaction support, new features/bug fixes are not implemented anywhere near a timely manner (the most requested feature 'deep populate' has been lingering in their github issues list for over a year and a half now).