When comparing Mach vs Adonisjs, the Slant community recommends Adonisjs for most people. In the question“What are the best node.js web frameworks?” Adonisjs is ranked 2nd while Mach is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Adonisjs is:
If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Streaming
Mach has some pretty cool streaming functionalities built directly into it, if your web app provides any audio/video/data streaming features, you can consider using Mach to build it.
Pro Composability
Since Mach already is asynchronous (stateless) which means your logic is implemented by using promises (then objects
); hence your functions are pretty independent and composable.
Pro Simplicity
No complex layers between plain HTTP requests and the corresponding JS functions invoked. Which in turn means each GET/POST/PUT or any other HTTP request is directly mapped to a Javascript function. Hence leading to a huge increase in performance for your app
Pro Robust
One of the distinguishing features of Mach is it's robustness, errors won't be terminating your complete app, instead they'll bubble up so you can handle them gracefully.
Pro Asynchronous
Like most of the Node.js's core, Mach is an asynchronous web framework too. Each response (of a request) can simply be hooked up to a then
method so that its result or the reason for failure can be retrieved after the action is complete. If you're wondering what async operations are, here's a pretty good explanation for you
Pro Based on Laravel PHP Framework
If you are already programming in PHP with Laravel, you will have no trouble starting development with Node using Adonis.
Pro Similar to Rails
Pro Built-in modules for everything
There are built-in modules for everything: Auth, Social Auth, mailing ect
Pro Has websocket support out of the box
Pro Very good documentation
Pro Easy to learn, especially if you're already familiar with Laravel
Pro Option for full-stack or api standalone implementation
You can choose to use the full-stack version or if you wish to build a RESTful API you can choose to use the api standalone version.
Cons
Con No NOSQL integration
Only used ORM, not ODM.