When comparing dwm vs notion, the Slant community recommends dwm for most people. In the question“What are the best window managers for Linux?” dwm is ranked 5th while notion is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose dwm is:
Dwm is part of the [suckless suite of tools](http://suckless.org/), and encourages users to extend and configure it by modifying the code itself. To this end, dwm is kept under 2000 SLOC, and is an exemplar of clean, readable code (C). This, while giving users all the flexibility they could ask for, also makes dwm as lightweight as possible, and means that users have a full understanding of how it works.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Encourages user modification
Dwm is part of the suckless suite of tools, and encourages users to extend and configure it by modifying the code itself. To this end, dwm is kept under 2000 SLOC, and is an exemplar of clean, readable code (C). This, while giving users all the flexibility they could ask for, also makes dwm as lightweight as possible, and means that users have a full understanding of how it works.
Pro Simple and small
Dwm is a low-resource window manager that is entirely simplistic in design.
Pro Application grouping with tags
Dwm's design paradigm is to use tags to group clients (applications) that can then be pulled into a view (workspace); this allows you to view multiple clients at once and to assign or reassign those tags and their related views on the fly.
Contrary to most other window managers, when you view a tag you are not ‘visiting’ a workspace: you are pulling the tagged windows into a single workspace.
Combined with rules in the
config.h, this makes for a flexible and responsive means to manage your workflow.
Pro Easy to configure
Configuring dwm is straight-forward thanks to its config.h file (though it will have to be rebuilt for the effects to take place).
Pro Default keybindings and functionality are very useful and well thought-out
An example of this is the application of alt-tab to switch between two tags.
Pro Useful and informative status bar
The dwm status bar can be set to display all kinds of useful information, such as volume level, wifi signal strength, and battery notification.
Pro XRandR/Xinerama support
Dwm has support for XRandR and Xinerama, allowing for multi-monitor support.
Pro Uses LUA scripting language
Notion uses the powerful and efficient scripting language, LUA, for configuration and scripting.
Pro Offers both tiling and floating windows
Notion allows the user to have both tiling and floating windows in the same workspaces, which not only adds variation but allows for flexibility in appeasing the user's preferences.
Pro Light resource usage
Lightweight, requiring few resources to run smoothly, notion is perfect for systems with low resources.
Pro Multiple workspaces
Multiple workspaces are supported in notion.
Pro Easy to manipulate the layout
It is easy to manage the tiling layout of notion: the user can sort and re-size tiles by keyboard or mouse (unlike many tiling window managers which perform auto-layout).
Con No runtime config file
There is no config file that can be edited after the window manager is compiled: all changes need to be made prior to compiling.
Con By developers, for developers
Basic knowledge of C language, general programming, and compilation are all required.
Con Complicated configuration
Compared to other window managers, notion is rather hard to configure. There are five different files that you have to tinker with in order to configure notion the way you want it to be. This may not be too difficult but it is still much more difficult than WMs that only require change to one single text file.
Con System tray can be difficult to add
Setting up a system tray on the desktop can be difficult to accomplish.