Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Famous vs animo.js, the Slant community recommends animo.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript animation frameworks or libraries?” animo.js is ranked 4th while Famous is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose animo.js is:
The only dependency Animo has is jQuery. The source also includes animate.css as a stylesheet, but you can always add yours if you wish to do so.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro 3D physics engine
Famous offers a 3D engine through via WebGL. This engine is very similar to those found in videogame engines.
Pro Amazing performance
Famous makes it possible to create animations through DOM and WebGL that are up to 60FPS. In other words, the Famous engine is able to create native animations inside the web browser.
Pro Open Source
Famous is a free and open source project released under the MIT License.
Pro SEO friendly
Since Famous renders on DOM (as well as WebGL) it's SEO friendly, because web crawlers can read everything that's rendered on the DOM.
Pro Few dependencies
The only dependency Animo has is jQuery. The source also includes animate.css as a stylesheet, but you can always add yours if you wish to do so.
Pro You can get personal help from the development team by paying
The animo.js team offer the option to contact and get help personally from the dev team by paying an amount of money (2 days for $5 2 weeks for $30 Lifetime for $100).
Alternatively, being an open source project you can still open an issue and get help from other developers that use this library.
Pro Includes CSS animation library out of the box
Animo.js has a CSS animation library (animate.css) included by default, which provides developers with 60 pre-made CSS animations where they can choose from.
Pro Open source
Animo.js is a free and open source tool.
Cons
Con Dead project
Famous has been abandoned and will not get updates or bug fixes anymore.
Con Development seems slow
From their Github repo it seems that development is going pretty slow. Issue reports are still getting answered but the latest commit to the master branch happened more than 6 months ago.
