Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Move.js Ok vs animo.js, the Slant community recommends animo.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript animation frameworks or libraries?” animo.js is ranked 4th while Move.js Ok is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose animo.js is:
The only dependency Animo has is jQuery. The source also includes animate.css as a stylesheet, but you can always add yours if you wish to do so.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Simple to use
Move.js is just a simple JS layer on top of CSS3 animations. It's pretty easy to use because it just exposes an API with which you can use CSS selectors and props to animate objects.
Pro Lightweight
Move.js is extremely small and lightweight (only 13KB) JavaScript library.
Pro Few dependencies
The only dependency Animo has is jQuery. The source also includes animate.css as a stylesheet, but you can always add yours if you wish to do so.
Pro You can get personal help from the development team by paying
The animo.js team offer the option to contact and get help personally from the dev team by paying an amount of money (2 days for $5 2 weeks for $30 Lifetime for $100).
Alternatively, being an open source project you can still open an issue and get help from other developers that use this library.
Pro Includes CSS animation library out of the box
Animo.js has a CSS animation library (animate.css) included by default, which provides developers with 60 pre-made CSS animations where they can choose from.
Pro Open source
Animo.js is a free and open source tool.
Cons
Con Seems dead
Latest commit is dated November 30 2015. The last pull request that was closed is dated September 25 2015.
Con Development seems slow
From their Github repo it seems that development is going pretty slow. Issue reports are still getting answered but the latest commit to the master branch happened more than 6 months ago.
