Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Pamac vs paru, the Slant community recommends paru for most people. In the question“What are the best AUR helpers for Arch-based Linux distributions?” paru is ranked 6th while Pamac is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose paru is:
You can simply alias yay=paru if you switch from yay.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Other Questions
No other questions
Pros
Pro Supports installation of local packages
Pro Supports installation of local packages
Pro AUR support
Pro Based on the design of yay
You can simply alias yay=paru if you switch from yay.
Pro Fast
Paru is faster than yay.
Pro Actively maintained
With the main yay developer stepping away from yay, paru is more actively maintained than yay.
Pro Saner defaults than yay
Cons
Con No GUI this is a CLI manager
Con No official way to downgrade an update
Con Doesn't provide clean removals of dependencies consistently
No cons yet!