Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Tresorit vs TeraCopy, the Slant community recommends Tresorit for most people. In the question“What are the best personal file-syncing solutions?” Tresorit is ranked 5th while TeraCopy is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Tresorit is:
Encryption is performed before content gets uploaded to the cloud.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Client-side encryption
Encryption is performed before content gets uploaded to the cloud.
Pro Cross-platform
With clients for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Windows Phone, and Blackberry.
Pro Free storage space (get additional space through bonuses)
5 GB, up to 16 GB with bonuses.
Pro Faster file deletion
It deletes files much much faster than built in Windows file manager.
Pro Can check files for copy errors
TeraCopy can automatically check/verify the copied files for errors, by calculating their CRC or other checksum/hash value.
Pro Seamless shell integration
Pro Skips badly copied files
TeraCopy skips badly copied files during the copying process, and then displays them at the end of the transfer "Verify" with checksum/hash, so you can see which files to re-copy. See also, OpenHashTab for Windows and DeadHash for Windows, Linux, Android.
Cons
Con No Telephone Support
Con Proprietary
Because the software is proprietary, there's no way to review the security practices or really know how the software operates under the hood. As such it can be considered as not safe for sensitive information.
Con Significantly more expensive than just about everything else
Con Sometimes clashes with 7 zip
From my experience, TeraCopy does not do well in conjunction with 7zips.
It seems to error on some systems when you do a drag-and-drop extract.
