When comparing Kinto vs Kuzzle, the Slant community recommends Kuzzle for most people. In the question“What are the best alternatives to Firebase?” Kuzzle is ranked 3rd while Kinto is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Kuzzle is:
Supports REST, WebSockets and MQ protocols.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Open Source
Kinto is released under Apache v2, which is one of the most flexible licenses.
Pro Good for sensitive data
Since Kinto is a self-hosted solution, it can be used to store sensitive data (emails, financial data etc...) safely, since only the developer has access to the backend.
Pro Fined-grained permissions
Allows to share individual or collection of records for read or write operations.
Pro Push notification support
Pro File attachments on records
Using the kinto-attachment plugin, the server can attach files to records (hosted by server or Amazon S3)
Pro Backed by Mozilla
Mozilla uses it in production to synchronize security settings for Firefox. This means that the product should have adequate support for an extended period of time due to Mozillas use of it.
Pro Multiprotocol
Supports REST, WebSockets and MQ protocols.
Pro Realtime through filters
You do not connect to classic rooms but to search filters and can be warned of changes on permanent storage or volatile one.
Pro Open Source
Kuzzle is open source and it's released under the Apache 2 License.
Pro Javascript SDK
A fully documented javascript SDK exists.
Cons
Con No hosted version
In order to use kinto you have to download it and host it on your own server infrastructure. While it does help you avoid outsourcing your data to a third-party, it also adds the overhead of having to maintain a backend for your app.
Con Not as usable as Parse
Parse had several SDKs available which made it a breeze to integrate it with any platform that you wanted.
Con May have issues since it's stil la relatively young project
Kuzzle is (as of February 2nd, 2015) in alpha version and approaching beta.
