When comparing MPV vs 1by1, the Slant community recommends MPV for most people. In the question“What are the best audio players for Windows?” MPV is ranked 8th while 1by1 is ranked 25th. The most important reason people chose MPV is:
When used with youtube-dl.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Integrates with streaming services
When used with youtube-dl.
Pro Needs no additional codecs
Everything MPV needs to play media files is contained within which means no outside codecs are needed.
Pro Minimal interface
Click to open files and get Video with sound (and passthrough of codecs like DTS etc) for a perfect cinema experience. Works okay for many files.
Default window is not much more than a title bar - and if you drag/resize the window it resizes the video and leaves no empty areas. There is no visible control or display unless you use mouse/keyboard over the window.
This is the best player to use unless you're going for a media center (then use MPV based Plex Media Player to display and play the Plex Server library).
Pro Up to date
Always up to date, rapid development.
Pro Extremely responsive
Pro Caches livestreams
Intelligently caches livestreams and enables jumping within the cached stream.
Pro Fast
Pro A lot of features
Gapless play, transition overlapping, audio enhancer, cue sheet support, playlist support, favorites, theme presets, global hotkeys, and more.
Pro Small footprint
Very small size, low resource usage, and portable.
Pro Full resume play
Remembers last track and position.
Pro Cool audio equalizers
You can select presets or customize the whole listening experience.
Pro Fast and smooth play
Gapless play is supported. You can add transitions so that the last ten seconds melt into the first of the next song. There is an intro scan where you can fastly find a certain song. When you drag the wheel to the maximum, the loudness is better than with other players.
Pro Fully customizable design
You can adjust every single color. And adjust everything else.
Pro Many settings
You can change everything, including shortcuts that also work in other apps.
Cons
Con Minimal theme support
Con Lack of a typical GUI can be jarring to some
The minimal interface comes at the cost of beginner-friendliness. You need to know keyboard shortcuts by heart, settings are set in text files, right-clicking won't bring up a menu, etc.
Con Basic installer
The installer sometimes does not create a start menu shortcut. To get full functionality additional steps are required.
