Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing TurboGears 2 vs Falcon, the Slant community recommends Falcon for most people. In the question“What are the best general-purpose Python web frameworks usable in production sites?” Falcon is ranked 8th while TurboGears 2 is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Falcon is:
Falcon is designed entirely around building REST APIs. It achieves this helps a lot with it being lightweight and simple. It also helps developers take some design choices which would otherwise not be possible with a more general-purpose framework,
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro A powerful and flexible Object Relational Mapper (ORM) with real multi-database support
SQLAlchemy is a powerful ORM which is highly regarded in the Python community. TurboGears' ORM is built with SQLAlchemy, which gives it a great deal of flexibility and power.
Pro Code that is as natural as writing a function
Pro Starts as a microframework and scales up to a fullstack solution
Allows developers to build quick, simple web prototypes or scale up to create complex web applications.
Pro Support for Horizontal data partitioning (aka, sharding)
TurboGears allows for horizontal data partitioning, which allows the division of logical datatabases into smaller elements.
Pro Built in extensibility Pluggable Applications and standard WSGI components
Allows for creating extendable Pluggable Applications which extend the framework itself through endpoints provided by TurboGears.
Pro Validated and compile time checked template engine
The template engine is XHTML based and so is validated for errors when compiled to HTML. You will never serve a broken page again due to a forgotten close tag
Pro Aims for a flexible design
TurboGears2 does not get in your way on how to design your applications, classes etc.
Pro Built to build REST APIs
Falcon is designed entirely around building REST APIs. It achieves this helps a lot with it being lightweight and simple. It also helps developers take some design choices which would otherwise not be possible with a more general-purpose framework,
Pro Lightweight with minimal dependencies
Falcon is a very lightweight framework. This can be noticed simply by looking at the dependency list: other than the python standard library, six and mimeparse are the only dependencies.
Pro Performance is really awesome
Cons
Con The great extensibility can feel overwhelming
Sometimes TurboGears' extensibility and feeling of having different options for doing a single thing can feel overwhelming and as if writing everything from scratch.
Con small community
Con Limited in scope
Being designed around building REST APIs and the fact that it's minimalistic with very few dependencies makes Falcon opinionated (you should build a REST API) and limited in scope (you shouldn't be using Falcon to build a news site, blog or ecommerce platform).
