When comparing Nagare vs CherryPy, the Slant community recommends CherryPy for most people. In the question“What are the best general-purpose Python web frameworks usable in production sites?” CherryPy is ranked 9th while Nagare is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose CherryPy is:
It's very easy to choose what processes you want by turning them on or off. You can also configure per-URL as well.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Continuation based web framework
Nagare allows for simpler programming flow hiding client/server requests.
Pro 100% Python web application development - no HTML, CSS or JS needed
Nagare is a mature web framework that saves you from manually creating routes. It basically is just a Python object graph.
Pro Robust configuration mechanism
It's very easy to choose what processes you want by turning them on or off. You can also configure per-URL as well.
Pro Has production-ready server
Comes with a production level wsgi server that can be used instead of / in addition to gunicorn etc.
Pro Helps you organize the structure of your code
CherryPy provides some dispatcher patterns that support a wide range of functionality and provide some helpful ways of organizing the code.
Cons
Con Stateful server that maintains both session and UI states server side
Con Uses old YUI2 JS framework
Nagare uses YUI2 internally for XHR requests. YUI2 has been deprecated since 2011.
Con Lacking good documentation
CherryPy's documentation could use some work. It generally feels very slim and is seriously lacking in some parts. For a beginner who is just starting with Python Frameworks, working with CherryPy's documentation would be very hard.
