When comparing WEBP - Format vs JPEG - Format, the Slant community recommends WEBP - Format for most people. In the question“What are the best alternatives and lossless compressors for JPEG?” WEBP - Format is ranked 1st while JPEG - Format is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose WEBP - Format is:
Images saved in the WebP format have roughly the same quality as a JPEG image at about half the size.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Same quality for about half the size
Images saved in the WebP format have roughly the same quality as a JPEG image at about half the size.
Cons
Con Garbage format
Ultra compression algorithm destroys any traces of quality...is another google emanation...is not a copy of an image not even a preview or thumb is just a luke-like representation of the original image...destroys color profile and outlines look horrible... avoid this if you have respect for quality.
Con Not widely supported
Only has native support in Chrome and Opera.
Con save storage space in detriment of quality
it can be used only as preview...and...only if have q=95+ and subsampling =1x1 and dpi=300