When comparing AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs F(x) Data Cloud, the Slant community recommends F(x) Data Cloud for most people. In the question“What are the best services to host Django sites?” F(x) Data Cloud is ranked 1st while AWS Elastic Beanstalk is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose F(x) Data Cloud is:
If you wanna host your database on the cloud server, you can have both the option as Database as a Service (Pre-installed and managed database) or Infrastructure as a Service (If you want to have root access and manually want to install the database).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Manages application versions
Pro Highly customizable environment
Pro Multi environment support
They support environments and promoting releases from one environment to the other (e.g. qa -> production).
Pro Very cheap
Depending on your load, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is most likely the cheapest option for Node hosting. This is due to you only paying for the underlying AWS services.
Pro Option for hosting the database service on the cloud server.
If you wanna host your database on the cloud server, you can have both the option as Database as a Service (Pre-installed and managed database) or Infrastructure as a Service (If you want to have root access and manually want to install the database).
Pro High uptime
All the cloud services are with 99.95% uptime.
Pro Cost-friendly
F(x) Data Cloud provides public cloud server at a cheap price. The basic plan starts at $1.99/month.
Pro Great Support
Typically answers in minute.
Pro Provides high configurations
They provide 32 vCPU, 128 GB RAM, 2000 GB SSD, 9 TB network. For large businesses, high configurations are required.
Cons
Con Customization is not as straightforward as it could be
Con Deploying could be simplified
Con No GPU provided
GPU is not provided.