When comparing Grav CMS vs CargoCollective, the Slant community recommends CargoCollective for most people. In the question“What is the best website builder for a portfolio site?” CargoCollective is ranked 7th while Grav CMS is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose CargoCollective is:
Websites built with CargoCollective can use the custom built-in video player. This means that there's no need to upload your videos on Youtube or Vimeo if you want to put them on your portfolio.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast, easy to use
Very fast, easy to update, - has admin panel for noobies or just edit markdown files for posts.
Pro Does not use any database, a complete flat Elise CMS
Database being a point of vulnerability is completely removed from the equation with it's flat file approach.
Pro Has a built-in video player
Websites built with CargoCollective can use the custom built-in video player. This means that there's no need to upload your videos on Youtube or Vimeo if you want to put them on your portfolio.
Pro Cloud-based image storage
Pro Requires only minimal CSS and HTML knowledge to configure
You can also configure templates to make your website look the way you want it to. For this, it's only required that you know a little HTML and CSS, nothing too advanced.
Pro More than thirty templates available
You can choose between 30+ pre-made templates before building your portfolio website.
Cons
Con Not User Friendly
Require some technical knowledge to use
