When comparing Luminus vs Padrino, the Slant community recommends Padrino for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Padrino is ranked 43rd while Luminus is ranked 59th. The most important reason people chose Padrino is:
Padrino is as fast as Sinatra, but extra features are added to this framework. They include namespaced route aliases, nested routes, controllers, a mailer system, unified logging and a lot more.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro ClojureScript for client-side scripting
Luminus allows using ClojureScript for client-side development. This allows sharing things like validation logic between the server and the client.
Pro Luminus is flexible
Luminus is built on a stack of composable libraries that can be easily swapped to make the application fit the needs of the user. The applications are generated using Leiningen templates and can be initialized with a specific set of features, such as database connections, needed for a specific application.
Pro Good documentation
Luminus provides step-by-step documentation on how to accomplish common tasks.
Pro Simple to setup and use
Luminus is small and flexible. It's geared towards interactive development using the REPL. You can see your changes as you're working without having to restart the application.
Pro Ruby framework based on Sinatra - with extra features
Padrino is as fast as Sinatra, but extra features are added to this framework. They include namespaced route aliases, nested routes, controllers, a mailer system, unified logging and a lot more.
Pro Open source
Padrino is open-source.