FeathersJS vs Rocket
When comparing FeathersJS vs Rocket, the Slant community recommends Rocket for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Rocket is ranked 14th while FeathersJS is ranked 35th. The most important reason people chose Rocket is:
Rocket makes extensive use of Rust's code generation tools to provide a clean API.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can sync events between different Node instances
Feather can sync events happening in two different Node processes or even servers in real-time. For example: an event happens in server A, the user connected to server B is instantly notified of that event.
This is done through a central Redis or Mongo collection or through a websocket libraries' clustering library.
Pro Easy REST APIs
Through services, Feathers provides instant CRUD functionality, it also can easily expose a RESTful and real-time API through HTTP/HTTPS and websockets.
Pro Can be integrated in an existing ExpressJS project
Since Feathers itself is built on top of Express (it's a thin wrapper over socket.io, primus and Express) and because of Feathers' highly modular nature, it's very easy to integrate Feathers in an existing Express project.
Pro Plug-in any feature you need
Feathers makes extensive use of modules (which are called Feathers services). These services work like ExpressJS middleware and can be used with app.use('/path', serviceObject)
.
Services help developers keep their applications modular and as minimal as possible, without any unnecessary libraries or bloat.
Pro Support for different socket transports
FeatherJS uses primus which is a universal wrapper for real-time frameworks. Through primus you can easily choose which socket transport you want to use.
Pro Easy To Use
Rocket makes extensive use of Rust's code generation tools to provide a clean API.
Pro Streams
Rocket streams all incoming and outgoing data, so size isn't a concern.
Pro Cookies
View, add, or remove cookies, with or without encryption, without hassle.
Pro Testing Library
Unit test your applications with ease using the built-in testing library.
Pro Extensible
Easily create your own primitives that any Rocket application can use.
Pro Templating
Rocket makes rendering templates a breeze with built-in templating support.
Pro Query Strings
Handling query strings and parameters is type-safe and easy in Rocket.
Pro Type Safe
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something.
Pro Boilerplate Free
Spend your time writing code that really matters, and let Rocket generate the rest.
Pro Config Environments
Configure your application your way for development, staging, and production.
Cons
Con Not so widely used
Could be problematic to convince the client use this framework in his/her project.
Con Not very beginner friendly
Although the documentation for Feathers is very good, it still needs some configuration in order to get Feathers up for developing something with it.
Con Abandoned
Con Nightly
Uses only nightly versions of Rust.