When comparing Propel vs Solr, the Slant community recommends Propel for most people. In the question“What are the best PHP ORMs?” Propel is ranked 5th while Solr is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Propel is:
It requires some learning curve, but at the end it's a powerful and versatile ORM. We've been using it for a very big database in a realtime multi-frontend app with zero issues.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Powerful and versatile ORM
It requires some learning curve, but at the end it's a powerful and versatile ORM. We've been using it for a very big database in a realtime multi-frontend app with zero issues.
Pro Support for a large number of databases
Since it uses PDO, it supports all PDO enabled databases, with MySQL, SQLite, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Oracle included.
Pro Simple to learn
Propel uses Active Record, which is a rather simple to understand implementation of an ORM. It's also the most widely adopted implementation. In simple words: an object represents a row, you can create or edit an object to create or edit the corresponding row.
Pro Customizablity
A key differentiator of Solr is the level of customizability the SearchComponent feature provides.
SearchComponent provides the developer astonishing flexibility in the way search queries are assembled and executed. At the time of writing, there does not appear to be a ElasticSearch equivalent of SearchComponent. source
Whilst ElasticSearch has a number of plugin-points there doesn't appear to be an equivalent of Solr's SearchComponent that enables you to modify the workflow of existing API endpoints.
Pro Open source
Pro Stats component
Solr allows to view average, standard deviation, maximum, minimum, sum of squares of a particular numeric field. It also allows faceting of that numeric field based on the value(s) of other fields.
Pro Results grouping
Solr allows you to group search results. Results can be grouped by:
- Field Value
- Query
- Function Query
You can also collapse multiple results with the same field value down to a single result.
Pro Decision tree faceting
Solr has a faceting feature called pivot facets or 'decision tree facets'. Pivot facets enable you to calculate facets inside a parents facet, for example pivoting on 'size' than 'color' returns 'color' facet counts for each 'size' facet
Pro Local params
Solr has a great feature that enables you to use LocalParams to perform more advanced faceting. They provide a way to "localize" information about a specific argument that is being sent to Solr. In other words, LocalParams provide a way to add meta-data to certain argument types such as query strings. From the Solr Wiki:
LocalParams are expressed as prefixes to arguments to be sent to Solr. For example:
Assume we have the existing query parameter
q=solr rocks
We can prefix this query string with LocalParams to provide more information to the query parser, for example changing the default operator type to "AND" and the default field to "title" for the lucene query parser:
q={!q.op=AND df=title}solr rocks
Pro SpellChecker
Solr allows has the functionality to check and correct spelling mistakes in search queries. The three main implementations are:
- IndexBasedSpellChecker
- WordBreadkSolrSpellChecker
- DirectSolrSpellChecker
Cons
Con Backward compatibiliy breaks
Since it's based on PHP 5.4+, using an older version of PHP may cause issues.
Con General missing features
Solr is currently missing the following general features:
- Per-doc/query analyzer chain
- Support for nested documents
- Support for multiple document types per schema
- Ability to modify document scores with custom scripts
- Equivalent to Elasticsearch's percolation
Con Missing some useful features for cloud distribution
Solr is currently missing the following features that are useful when managing a distributed system:
- Automatic shard rebalancing
- Ability to re-locate shards and replicas on demand
- Ability to change the schema without restarting the server
- Ability to search across multiple indexes.
