When comparing Nickle vs Actix, the Slant community recommends Actix for most people. In the question“What are the best web frameworks for Rust?” Actix is ranked 2nd while Nickle is ranked 6th.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Custom error handler
By default nickel catches all errors with its default ErrorHandler and tries to take reasonable actions. In cases where one wants to provide an own ErrorHandler (e.g. for custom 404 pages), it's trivial to write one
Pro Easy Templating
Nickel supports defining templates with mustache.rs. All you need is to create the template
Pro JSON handling
nickel makes it easy to map JSON data right onto your struct
Pro Middleware
Middleware are the extensibility points of nickel. Batteries included! A bunch of existing Middleware comes right with nickel
Pro Flexible routing
Routes can be as simple as /foo, use parameters, wildcards or even double wildcards
Pro Blazingly fast
Pro Feature-rich
Actix provides a lot of features out of box. WebSockets, HTTP/2, pipelining etc
Pro Type-safe
Forget about stringly typed objects, from request to response, everything has types
Pro Extensible
Easily create your own libraries that any Actix application can use