Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWikitravel vs FlyGRN
When comparing Wikitravel vs FlyGRN, the Slant community recommends Wikitravel for most people. In the question“What are the best sites to aid in holiday/vacation planning?” Wikitravel is ranked 5th while FlyGRN is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Wikitravel is:
Rather than give you a long list of all possible attractions, wikitravel lists only the most popular/must see spots. This saves you time when picking out quality attractions.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Overview of the best/most popular attractions
Rather than give you a long list of all possible attractions, wikitravel lists only the most popular/must see spots. This saves you time when picking out quality attractions.
Pro Doesn't look like a marketing pitch
Wikitravel, true to the format of Wikipedia, doesn't have ads, and the content isn't worded in a way that makes readers feel like they're being pitched to go somewhere by a travel agency.
Pro Attractions are separated into a variety of categories
It's easy/quick to find the type of attractions that appeal to you most because of the way they are organized. "See", "Do", "Learn", "Buy" etc..
Pro Free carbon offsetting
When you book a flight with FlyGRN's partners, they receive a fee. FlyGRN uses a part of that fee to support building solar panel projects in India to offset the carbon emissions of your flight for free.
Pro Often cheapest
Has often the cheapest flights, but not always.
Cons
Con Uncertain how the quality is checked
Con Can be outdated
Con Limited pictures
There are very few pictures of the destination, with none (in most cases) of specific attractions. If you want to get an idea of what the attraction looks like, you'll need to find images on google or other sites.
Con Short descriptions
Descriptions of each attraction are often only a couple of sentences.
Con Not always cheapest
Although it often finds the best prices, sometimes other sites are cheaper.
