When comparing Brasero vs Sound Juicer, the Slant community recommends Brasero for most people. In the question“What are the best CD rippers for UNIX-like systems?” Brasero is ranked 5th while Sound Juicer is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Brasero is:
The interface of the app is straightforward, meaning it is easy to understand and use for any type of user.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use
The interface of the app is straightforward, meaning it is easy to understand and use for any type of user.
Pro Uses MusicBrainz
Pro Nice user interface
Pro Default FLAC support
Sound Juicer supports ripping to FLAC out of the box with no need for other files.
Cons
Con Only works on the Linux OS
Brasero is only available for the Linux OS, it does not support OSX or Windows.
Con Limited preference settings
No option to choose mp3 bitrate.
Con Can't extract to wav format
Con Can't control bitstream and sampling rate
These are properties of the file, so you get what's there - an exact digital copy of the material on the CD. Changing these means editing the file. The most common sampling rate is 44.1K samples/second with a sample size of 16 bits. Unless you're dealing with studio masters, which are often recorded at a sample rate of 48K samples/second, there's no advantage at all in upping the specs on a file which was recorded on CD at 16/44.1.