When comparing NetBSD vs Siduction, the Slant community recommends Siduction for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for misanthropes?” Siduction is ranked 67th while NetBSD is ranked 102nd. The most important reason people chose Siduction is:
Apt/Aptitude, debconf or the alternatives system.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Adhere to the standard
It adheres to traditional Unix and new defined standards.
Pro It's Open Source
It's open source with a BSD License, which is much more business friendly than GPL. It's the real ancestor of Mac, that is being used nowadays.
Pro It's real
Under NetBSD csh is csh not tcsh; also vi is real vi not elvis, nvi or vim. It's ideal for purists.
Pro Architecture portability
It's the most portable OS in the world when considering what architectures it can run on. It runs on very wide range of hardware, from toaster to satellites. This of course does not mean it supports drivers for many consumer facing products making it a difficult solution to just boot up and use when compared to other OSs.
Pro Clean source code
It prioritizes source code cleanliness over anything.
Pro Debian based
Apt/Aptitude, debconf or the alternatives system.
Pro Updates are slow, but stable. It is based on Debian after all.
It uses Unstable per default so it is still some kind of stable since all dangerous packages are tested in experimental first.
Pro Secure Boot support
It supports secure boot which is great for LiveCDs and dual boot systems.
Cons
Con Lack of drivers
It lacks drivers for some new devices.
Con Hardware recognition is bad compared to Ubuntu.
Siduction won't install any non-free drivers by default.
