Here’s the Deal

fugitive (via vim) vs GitHub Desktop

13 0

121 70

When comparing fugitive (via vim) vs GitHub Desktop, the Slant community recommends fugitive (via vim) for most people. In the question“What are the best Git clients for macOS?” fugitive (via vim) is ranked 10th while GitHub Desktop is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose fugitive (via vim) is:

The visualization and workflow are great in fugitive. You can do side-by-side or even intra-line diffs all without having to leave your text editor.

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best Git clients for macOS?

Pros

Pro
Great visualization and interactive workflow

The visualization and workflow are great in fugitive. You can do side-by-side or even intra-line diffs all without having to leave your text editor.

Pro
Uninterrupted workflow for common tasks

Simple tasks, such as commits, can quickly be made without leaving the editor.

Pro
Seamlessly "Dive into Diffs" to trace the origin & intent of code

git blame only shows the last change (e.g. a variable rename), but how do you find the origin of the code?

:GBlame to open blame window

o on the relevant line to "git show" the commit

select a diff line from a previous version of the file, and hit o to open it

repeat 1 - 3, jumping back through history to find the origin of the line

Pro
Great GitHub integration

This is the official GitHub desktop client built by the GitHub team.

Pro
Simple, streamlined GUI

GitHub Desktop uses an extremely simplistic two-panel view. It's not capable of complex historical visualisations like other GUIs, but it is very easy to use (especially for git novices).

Pro
Supports pull requests

In addition to being able to seamlessly and easily integrate with all of GitHub's features, it also supports forking and submitting pull requests on any open source project hosted on GitHub.

Ad
Cons

Con
Poor documentation

The documentation is rather poor and not very helpful.

Con
Limited

Can't handle complex tasks. The Help Manual advises to use command-line Git instead.

Con
Does not support multiple Remotes for a repo

Only allowed to assign one URL as remote. To manage/sync/fetch other remotes, use command-line Git instead.

Con
Overly Simplified UI

UI that is designed not to support the needs of power and enterprise users. Management of more than five repos is next to impossible.

Con
Buggy

Poster child for authors' programming ideology (FRP), likely the cause for the odd quirks and bugs it has.

Con
Not free/libre

This application is proprietary, and thus cannot be modified or freely distributed.

Con
No Linux support

There's no Linux version of this client.

Con
Non-GitHub repositories are not fully supported

Since this is mainly a GitHub client, other repositories are not fully supported and with as many features and setting up a repo hosted anywhere else but GitHub is troublesome.