When comparing WebTorrent Desktop vs KTorrent, the Slant community recommends WebTorrent Desktop for most people. In the question“What are the best Torrent clients?” WebTorrent Desktop is ranked 7th while KTorrent is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose WebTorrent Desktop is:
Before the torrent is complete, you can stream the video and audio. It even supports seeking - it prioritizes the current location instead of always going in sequential order. You can also stream to Chromecast, DLNA, and AirPlay.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Streaming supported
Before the torrent is complete, you can stream the video and audio. It even supports seeking - it prioritizes the current location instead of always going in sequential order.
You can also stream to Chromecast, DLNA, and AirPlay.
Pro Open Source
The developers have their files stored on GitHub.
Pro Beautiful interface
Pro Support webrtc peers
It supports webrtc peers which increases the swarm to allow for websites to stream.
Pro Insanely fast
Download multiple torrents simultaneously, efficiently and fast
Pro Comprehensive test suite
runs completely offline, so it's reliable and fast
Pro Supports advanced torrent client features
- magnet uri support via ut_metadata
- peer discovery via dht, tracker, and ut_pex
- protocol extension api for adding new extensions
Pro Exposes files as streams
Fetches pieces from the network on-demand so seeking is supported (even before torrent is finished)
Seamlessly switches between sequential and rarest-first piece selection strategy
Pro Good UI
KTorrent has a neat and minimal UI.
Pro Works great even with a high number of torrents
Even if you have 500+ torrents, KTorrent works without any issues.
Con Missing some more advanced controls
For those who like fine-tuning something simple into something crazy.
Con Requires KDE dependencies
This is somewhat inconvenient if you're not on KDE.