Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing dojox.gfx vs Pixi.js, the Slant community recommends Pixi.js for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript drawing libraries?” Pixi.js is ranked 12th while dojox.gfx is ranked 24th. The most important reason people chose Pixi.js is:
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
No other questions
Pros
Pro Cross platform
GFX can use a variety of formats to render (SVG, VML, canvas and SIlverlight). It simply does not lock you into one single browser's implementation of vector graphics.
Pro Supports WebGL w/ canvas fallback
Pixi is a WebGL renderer, but can fall back to canvas if WebGL is not supported or turned off.
Pro Will be familiar to ActionScript developers
Pixi.js uses a code structure that's very similar to ActionScript.
Cons
No cons yet!
Con Not a complete solution
Pixi only provides the renderer.