When comparing Trisquel GNU/Linux vs RebornOS, the Slant community recommends Trisquel GNU/Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for misanthropes?” Trisquel GNU/Linux is ranked 59th while RebornOS is ranked 91st. The most important reason people chose Trisquel GNU/Linux is:
Fresh installation looks great.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros

Pro Polished look and feel
Fresh installation looks great.
Pro Reliable and working great out-of-the-box
It works on many machines. Really good.
Pro Good but not so good
There's been a lot of effort put in this project through the years, there is no question about it. It's 100% free and it's very user-friendly, but it being based on Ubuntu 16.04 isn't the best thing, as you are working with software that still is actual but the versions are not the newest.
Pro Antergos with more desktops
Pro Highly and Easily Configurable
You can easily choose from a list of browsers, desktops, office suites, etc, all from the installer.
Pro Good Repo
Reborn's dedicated repo has some extra packages that are difficult to find elsewhere, in addition to the official Arch repos, community repos, and the AUR.
Cons
Con Avoid proprietary-only GPU drivers
GPUs without libre drivers are a problem (not fault of Trisquel, of course). Also Wi-Fi cards in the same vein.
Con Crashes
Crashes every time when trying to install.
Doesn't even install it in virtualbox or VMWare.
AVOID.
