When comparing Trisquel GNU/Linux vs ArchLabs Linux, the Slant community recommends Trisquel GNU/Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Trisquel GNU/Linux is ranked 29th while ArchLabs Linux is ranked 66th. The most important reason people chose Trisquel GNU/Linux is:
Fresh installation looks great.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros

Pro Polished look and feel
Fresh installation looks great.
Pro Reliable and working great out-of-the-box
It works on many machines. Really good.
Pro Good but not so good
There's been a lot of effort put in this project through the years, there is no question about it. It's 100% free and it's very user-friendly, but it being based on Ubuntu 16.04 isn't the best thing, as you are working with software that still is actual but the versions are not the newest.
Pro All the benefits of Arch Linux
Since this is an Arch-based distribution, it has all the same benefits.
Pro Powerful AL-installer
The ArchLabs installer is very simple and gives users so many choices such as kernels, bootloaders, which extra programs to install, whether you want LVM, etc.
Pro Lightning Fast
Pro Retains the minimalism of Arch
ArchLabs provides an easy-to-use installer without including unnecessary packages by default, unlike Manjaro.
Pro Inspired by BunsenLabs, Powered by Arch
Pro Highly technical and helpful forums
Cons
Con Avoid proprietary-only GPU drivers
GPUs without libre drivers are a problem (not fault of Trisquel, of course). Also Wi-Fi cards in the same vein.
Con The installer has been broken for most of this year
Con Systemd
