Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Seapine TestTrack ALM vs Aiveo, the Slant community recommends Aiveo for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” Aiveo is ranked 18th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Aiveo is:
Includes a task board to visualize your projects status.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool
TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.
Pro Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document
Pro Supports full SCM integration
Pro Supports full Traceability
Pro Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.
Pro Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development
You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.
Pro Task/Agile board
Includes a task board to visualize your projects status.
Pro Simple, clean, modern interface
Pro Includes a free tier
Free for up to 5 users.
Pro Paid plans are relatively cheap
Paid plans start at just $10/month.
Cons
Con Steep learning curve
TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.
Con Relatively new and not as feature rich as some competitors
Some of the bigger missing features are integrations with other systems. More reports, custom dashboards and importing and exporting of work items. For those that do not use these features it may not be a large issue, but for those that do, it could really limit the usefulness of this tool.
