When comparing Seapine TestTrack ALM vs Trac, the Slant community recommends Trac for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” Trac is ranked 15th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Trac is:
Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool
TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.
Pro Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document
Pro Supports full SCM integration
Pro Supports full Traceability
Pro Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.
Pro Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development
You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.
Pro Database support
Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite.
Pro GIT and SVN support
Pro Open source
Written in Python.
Pro Bitnami installer
Bitnami installer available.
Cons
Con Steep learning curve
TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.
Con Python
Python can be slow sometimes.