When comparing Seapine TestTrack ALM vs Codegiant, the Slant community recommends Codegiant for most people. In the question“What are the best bug/issue tracking tools for small development teams?” Codegiant is ranked 8th while Seapine TestTrack ALM is ranked 27th. The most important reason people chose Codegiant is:
Also provides access control to repositories.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Excellent dashboarding, burn-up/burn-down charts and a very flexible reporting tool
TestTrack ALM also supports a wide variety of filtering to help create that "ideal" report or dashboard.
Pro Fully supports export to Word of any artifact or an entire Requirements Document
Pro Supports full SCM integration
Pro Supports full Traceability
Pro Manage all product development phases and artifacts: Epic/Requirements Documents, Requirements/User Stories, Development Tasks, Test Cases, Test Runs and Issue Management.
Pro Very flexible ALM for all phases of product development
You can configure for Waterfall, Agile/Scrum, TDD, hybrid and more.
Pro Collaboration
Also provides access control to repositories.
Pro User friendly
The user interface is very simple and intuitive.
Pro Documentation tool
Create knowledge bases, API documentation, status pages, product roadmaps, etc.
Pro Import repositories
Easily import repositories from Github, Bitbucket, hosted Git servers, or SVN.
Cons
Con Steep learning curve
TestTrack ALM can be configured to just about any methodology out there. But that flexibility comes with a hefty learning curve for administration. Once learned, it's like riding a bike.
