Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing AOC C3583FQ vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2546, the Slant community recommends AOC C3583FQ for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” AOC C3583FQ is ranked 15th while BenQ ZOWIE XL2546 is ranked 55th. The most important reason people chose AOC C3583FQ is:
The monitor uses a VA-panel, which is comparable to IPS. Image quality is excellent and aspects such as color reproduction, contrast and brightness are all great.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Great image quality
The monitor uses a VA-panel, which is comparable to IPS. Image quality is excellent and aspects such as color reproduction, contrast and brightness are all great.
Pro Good viewing angles
Another advantage of the VA-panel is the range of the viewing angles. The monitor looks great from every horizontal and vertical viewing angle and color shifting doesn't occur.
Pro Curved display increases visual workspace
The AOC C3583FQ is curved and is angled similar to the curves of the human eye. Because of the curved screen, points on the screen are spread more evenly across your eyes, which increases your visual workspace and can reduce eyestrain.
Pro Connections integrated in the base
In terms of connectivity, all ports are integrated into the base of the large display. That results in a more tidy environment and no cables dangling on the rear of the display.
Pro Extremely high refresh rate
The maximum refresh rate of this display is 160 Hz, which is extremely fast - even for high-end standards. Most high-end displays only offer up to 144 Hz, but this AOC display is a bit faster. High refresh rates are excellent for fast-paced gaming action and ensures a much greater fluidity.
Pro Adjustable
It will not be a problem for you to get the best possible viewing angles on the XL2546 because the monitor supports all the critical ergonomic adjustments - silt and swivel angle adjustments and height adjustment.
Pro Ideal for competitive gaming
The BenQ XL2546 is an excellent pick for competitive gamers thanks to its exceptional responsiveness and superb motion handling. In fact, this is one of the fastest gaming monitors available on the market. Gaming feels lag-free thanks to the monitor's high native refresh rate and tiny input lag. Motion looks smooth and is free of the motion blur artifacts.
Cons
Con Smaller pixel density, not as sharp as other displays
The resolution of the AOC C3583FQ is Full HD, but because there's additional screen space on both sides, 2560 x 1080 pixels are displayed. This is the same pixel density as a regular 1080p non-ultrawide monitor. Because of the large screen size of 35 inch, this monitor isn't as sharp as some other displays. The amount of pixels per inch (ppi) is measured at 70.
Con Large stand-by power consumption
With a stand-by power consumption of over 60 watts, the AOC C3583FQ definitely isn't an economic display.
Con Doesn't support VESA mounting
The C3583FQ doesn't feature a VESA mount which makes wall-mounting or using an alternative stand impossible.
Con Awkward touch controls
The on-screen display and menu's of this AOC display are controlled via touch-sensitive controls on the base of the monitor. Due to the ultra-wide aspect ratio, the OSD can be a little bit awkard to control.
Con Sub-par picture quality
A lot of equally-priced competitors do offer significantly better picture quality than the BenQ XL2546 since, on this monitor, the images appear somewhat flat because of it's TN panel that can't recreate lifelike colors.
