Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing AOC C3583FQ vs Dell S2716DGR, the Slant community recommends AOC C3583FQ for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” AOC C3583FQ is ranked 15th while Dell S2716DGR is ranked 64th. The most important reason people chose AOC C3583FQ is:
The monitor uses a VA-panel, which is comparable to IPS. Image quality is excellent and aspects such as color reproduction, contrast and brightness are all great.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Great image quality
The monitor uses a VA-panel, which is comparable to IPS. Image quality is excellent and aspects such as color reproduction, contrast and brightness are all great.
Pro Good viewing angles
Another advantage of the VA-panel is the range of the viewing angles. The monitor looks great from every horizontal and vertical viewing angle and color shifting doesn't occur.
Pro Curved display increases visual workspace
The AOC C3583FQ is curved and is angled similar to the curves of the human eye. Because of the curved screen, points on the screen are spread more evenly across your eyes, which increases your visual workspace and can reduce eyestrain.
Pro Connections integrated in the base
In terms of connectivity, all ports are integrated into the base of the large display. That results in a more tidy environment and no cables dangling on the rear of the display.
Pro Extremely high refresh rate
The maximum refresh rate of this display is 160 Hz, which is extremely fast - even for high-end standards. Most high-end displays only offer up to 144 Hz, but this AOC display is a bit faster. High refresh rates are excellent for fast-paced gaming action and ensures a much greater fluidity.
Pro Supports G-Sync
G-Sync eliminates screen tearing and reduces the overall input lag because it allows the monitor to synchronize its refresh rate with the framerate of your graphics card.
Pro Good for action gaming
In its price range, the Dell S2716DGR is among the very few monitors that offer truly smooth and lag-free gaming experience thanks to its high responsiveness and excellent motion handling.
Cons
Con Smaller pixel density, not as sharp as other displays
The resolution of the AOC C3583FQ is Full HD, but because there's additional screen space on both sides, 2560 x 1080 pixels are displayed. This is the same pixel density as a regular 1080p non-ultrawide monitor. Because of the large screen size of 35 inch, this monitor isn't as sharp as some other displays. The amount of pixels per inch (ppi) is measured at 70.
Con Large stand-by power consumption
With a stand-by power consumption of over 60 watts, the AOC C3583FQ definitely isn't an economic display.
Con Doesn't support VESA mounting
The C3583FQ doesn't feature a VESA mount which makes wall-mounting or using an alternative stand impossible.
Con Awkward touch controls
The on-screen display and menu's of this AOC display are controlled via touch-sensitive controls on the base of the monitor. Due to the ultra-wide aspect ratio, the OSD can be a little bit awkard to control.
Con Sub-par picture quality
Regarding picture quality, the Dell S2716DGR performs noticeably worse than the majority of equally-priced monitors because of the low-end TN panel it has. Its TN panel fails to display crisp and vivid colors. Instead, the colors look flat and washed-out.
Con Sub-par picture quality
Regarding picture quality, the Dell S2716DGR performs noticeably worse than the majority of equally-priced monitors because of the low-end TN panel it has. Its TN panel fails to display crisp and vivid colors. Instead, the colors look flat and washed-out.
Con Sub-par picture quality
Regarding picture quality, the Dell S2716DGR performs noticeably worse than the majority of equally-priced monitors because of the low-end TN panel it has. Its TN panel fails to display crisp and vivid colors. Instead, the colors look flat and washed-out.
