When comparing Dvorak Simplified Keyboard vs Norman, the Slant community recommends Dvorak Simplified Keyboard for most people. In the question“What are the best keyboard layouts for programming?” Dvorak Simplified Keyboard is ranked 2nd while Norman is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Dvorak Simplified Keyboard is:
Designed with comfort in mind.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro More ergonomic
Designed with comfort in mind.
Pro Standard on all operating systems
You can find this layout on all operating systems.
Pro Opportunity to learn proper touch typing
Most people passively learn and use QWERTY-based layouts before switching to Dvorak. The switch gives them an opportunity to completely relearn 10-finger typing, which is where a significant portion of the speedup comes from. Coupled with more ergonomic key placement, this makes for a more enjoyable typing experience.
Pro You can reuse qwerty layout
Since letters and symbols only change place, but not key, you can change the keys on your keyboard and get a full comfortable Dvorak layout, without having to buy a new keyboard.
Pro Useful keys in home row
70% of more useful keys are placed in the home row.
Pro Favours the right hand
Unlike other layouts, such as workman, norman favours the right hand due to it usually being stronger than the left.
Pro Keeps many common QWERTY shortcuts intact
Common shortcuts, such as ctrl + z, ctrl + x, etc., are kept in their original positions without much loss in ergonomics, making the transition easier.
Pro Uses the same fingers as QWERTY for most letters
Norman keeps 22/26 letters in their original QWERTY finger, making the transition easier, and, according to many tests, does so without much loss in ergonomics.
Pro Designed using normal keyboards in mind
Unlike keyboard layouts such as workman that are desgined to be used by matrix keyboards, norman is made to be used by a standard keyboard.
Pro Focuses on the keys easiest to reach for the human hand
Like Workman, Norman takes human anatomy into account.
Con Inconvenient for common key-shortcuts
Key bindings common to most applications, such as Ctrl+Z/C/V, can't be done on the left hand while mousing with the right. Shortcuts for other applications are out of the QWERTY positions they were designed for and aren't so convenient to access.
Con L is too hard to reach
L is not a rare letter. It's used even more than
U is in English. Why put it in a difficult spot for use with the weak pinky finger?
Con The "ls" command is uncomfortable to type
This is a very common command programmers have to type often when working with the shell. It's pretty awkward in Dvorak, especially when you add common options. Try typing "ls ‐latr", and see how that feels.
Con F is too hard to reach
F is not an especially common letter, but it's used much more than the rare letters
JQZ. Why is it on one of the most difficult spots on the keyboard? It's also used in
OF, one of the more common bigrams, ranked at #13. Maybe some other languages use
Z more than English, but why is
F harder to reach than
Con Not easy on the right pinky finger
Most useful symbols for programming are on the right pinky finger, which is not very comfortable.
Con Not actually faster than QWERTY
Maybe it's more ergonomic, but that's debatable. You'll certainly get more benefit from an ergonomic keyboard than a change in layout. Dvorak's reputation for speed is due to a typo in the initial press report, and a biased (and since discredited) study run by Dvorak himself.
Con Not the standard keyboard layout
It will be difficult to frequently switch between computers
Con Doesn't account for finger length
The keyboard layout doesn't account for E being easier to press than C for example on a QWERTY layout, this can be seen for example using the workman key cap scores done here.
Con The U is directly under your finger while the I is far away
I is used more--by about 2.5 times. In fact,
U is the least used vowel after
Y. The consonants
TNSHRDLC all appear more often. So why is
U directly under your finger? And why should you have to stretch for
Con A very small user base and community
Con Designed for right handed use
The norman was designed with right handed use in mind, making it a less attractive choise for left handed users, however tests done by some users (can be found in the comments) suggests that the norman layout might be balanced
Con Scores worse in ergonomics using the carpalx test
Norman, although scoring better in travel distance, generally scores worse in the carpalx test than layouts such as colemak. See the source here.