When comparing Facebook vs News as Facts, the Slant community recommends News as Facts for most people. In the question“What are the best websites for uncensored news?” News as Facts is ranked 2nd while Facebook is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose News as Facts is:
Design makes it very easy to read. No obstructions or ads anywhere.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Anyone can post
Pro Elegant design
Design makes it very easy to read. No obstructions or ads anywhere.
Pro Daily email digests
Once you sign up you can receive a daily email digest of the most important news right to your inbox every morning. It's probably the most efficient way to catch up on world news.
Pro No ads or tracking
News as Facts doesn't have any ads or tracking software. The site always loads instantly.
Pro Unbiased news
The news are sourced from Wikipedia so the language is neutral, concise, and always are from reputable sources.
Pro Custom themes
If you sign up you can customize the colors of the site to your liking.
Cons
Con Self-censored
In a way because social platforms show you what seems most relevant to you, you may end up not seeing things that are important; a kind of self-censoring.
Con Known cases of censoring
Facebook had cases of censoring content, pro Conservative US party for example.
Con Actively repress 1st amendment rights of americans despite being an american company
Violations of our highest laws is not acceptable behavior.
Con Will censor and ban you if you post anything that goes against government approved narrative
Even if you are posting truth and facts.
![Vetted.ai illustration](/images/ai/vetted-illustration.png)