Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Nevercode vs Codefresh, the Slant community recommends Nevercode for most people. In the question“What are the best hosted continuous integration services?” Nevercode is ranked 14th while Codefresh is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Nevercode is:
Simulating or emulating tests is good - actually testing on real hardware is better as you'll catch device (manufacturer) specific issues that would kill your app ratings in the wild.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Ability to run tests on real devices
Simulating or emulating tests is good - actually testing on real hardware is better as you'll catch device (manufacturer) specific issues that would kill your app ratings in the wild.
Pro Multiple integrations to cover your needs
Simplifies the instant access to the latest state of your apps.
Pro Easy to setup
There's no configuration files to write, nothing to download or install, nothing to really configure. Setting it up takes basically only adding your Git repository and waiting for the clone, build and test to finish.
Pro Focused on mobile app development
It's dedicated to mobile platforms and supports Andorid, iOS native apps + a couple of cross-platform frameworks such as Cordova and Ionic.
Pro Easy deployment to any cloud
Once your images, or entire compositions, are ready to be deployed, Codefresh can do it automatically at the end of every build process. Alternatively, you can manually deploy with a single click.
Pro Early Feature Previews
You can share new feature implementations with your team by allowing them to instantly run your Docker image directly from Codefresh.
Pro Super fast builds
Caching build dependencies and docker layers speeds up the application builds.
Cons
Con Project settings view could have a better UX to make it simpler for new users
Con Inflexible, can't implement multiple build tasks or target multiple modules
