Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing N2O vs Pyramid, the Slant community recommends Pyramid for most people. In the question“What are the best backend web frameworks?” Pyramid is ranked 15th while N2O is ranked 29th. The most important reason people chose Pyramid is:
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast binary data
Pro Binary encoding and protocols
Here is a list of types of endpoints which are supported by EMQ and accesible to N2O apps: WebSockets, MQTT, MQTT-SN, TCP, UDP, CoAP. Normal use of N2O as a Web Framework or a Web Application Server is through WebSockets, but for IoT and MQTT applications it could be served through UDP or SCTP protocols providing application level message delivery consistency.
Pro Very flexible
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Pro Persistence agnostic
Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin).
Pro Comes with security included
Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends.
Cons
Con Unfriendly developer community
Developers are often rude and unfriendly to users.
Con Bad documentation
It has bad documentation, which leaves out crucial steps, making it hard to learn.
Con The great number of options it offers can become intimidating
One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it.
