When comparing MockFlow vs Fireworks, the Slant community recommends Fireworks for most people. In the question“What are the best mockup and wireframing tools for websites?” Fireworks is ranked 4th while MockFlow is ranked 29th. The most important reason people chose Fireworks is:
From lo-fidelity wireframe, into clickable prototype and then assemble the images for the final hi-fi build as well.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Export to PNG, PDF, HTML
Export to PNG, PDF and HTML formats.
Pro Easy to learn
Easy to pick-up. In few minutes you can sketch your first pages.
Pro Online software
You can use it online. No download, no install, no mess.
Pro Free basic account
The free basic account give you a lot of features, all for free, forever.
Pro HTML5 rendering
Use many Bootstrap components and get the HTML5 view quickly. Sketch, see, repeat.
Pro Can be used for the entire life-cycle of the design
From lo-fidelity wireframe, into clickable prototype and then assemble the images for the final hi-fi build as well.
Pro Layer Sharing
Features such as 'Layer Sharing' allows you to quickly update shared components such as headers across multiple pages. Other mockup tools such as Mockingbird will require you to manually propagate changes across all the pages.
Pro PSD compatible
Open PSD files
Pro Awesome Symbol Libraries
A significant advantage over web-app style mockup tools are the symbol libraries for Fireworks.
From boagworld:
Both symbols, styles and vector shapes can be saved for re-use and collected into useful library resources. In addition Fireworks ships with a common library of useful objects including buttons, browser and application elements for both Mac and Windows look and feel.
http://speckycdn.sdm.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/ui_templates_02.jpg
Cons
Con Need a Flash plugin
Flash is a technology of the past. Unfortunately, they use it. "MockFlow requires Flash Player 10 or above."
Con Is being phased out
Adobe is ditching Fireworks. So those nasty bugs will never get fixed.