Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Gourmet vs Curl.js, the Slant community recommends Curl.js for most people. In the question“What are the best client-side JavaScript module loaders?” Curl.js is ranked 8th while Gourmet is ranked 9th.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Friendly asset handling
Auto-asset inclusion, native CSS support, and flexible bundling make handling your assets simple.
Pro ES6 support
Supports ES6 syntax by default.
Pro Easy configuration
Declarative configuration makes project setup easy.
Pro Isomorphic rendering by default
The runtime environment allows for isomorphic rendering of React applications by default.
Pro Size ~4KB (gzipped)
Pro Async loading on demand
Async loading on demand including loadings from cdns. For example it is easy to load jquery from cdn as a module. The same thing is not that easy to achieve in Webpack
Pro Provides legacy loader
Legacy loader supports loading of plain js files and exporting globals or even expressions.
Pro AMD & CJS module support
Supports both AMD and CommonJS modules.
Cons
Con Feature set is unclear
Con Not available yet
Con Zero documentation
Con Browser support unknown
Con Development has stopped
The maintainers have announced that all development for CurlJS has stopped, at least for the foreseeable future.
