Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Gourmet vs SystemJS, the Slant community recommends SystemJS for most people. In the question“What are the best client-side JavaScript module loaders?” SystemJS is ranked 1st while Gourmet is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose SystemJS is:
SystemJS supports AMD, CommonJS and ES6 modules.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Friendly asset handling
Auto-asset inclusion, native CSS support, and flexible bundling make handling your assets simple.
Pro ES6 support
Supports ES6 syntax by default.
Pro Easy configuration
Declarative configuration makes project setup easy.
Pro Isomorphic rendering by default
The runtime environment allows for isomorphic rendering of React applications by default.
Pro Supports multiple module formats
SystemJS supports AMD, CommonJS and ES6 modules.
Pro Can load static assets through plugins
System.js supports loading static assets such as images or stylesheets through loader plugins.
Pro No tools needed in dev, can seamlessly bundle when moving to prod
Pro Concise, Granular Configuration
Pro Easy to migrate to
A migration from RequireJS + loadCSS to only SystemJS can be done in only 2.5 hours.
Pro Even its dev. build is smaller than most of its competitors prod. build
With ~15Kb, its development build can load almost any type of JS module.
Cons
Con Feature set is unclear
Con Not available yet
Con Zero documentation
Con Browser support unknown
