When comparing Ink vs Pure CSS from Yahoo!, the Slant community recommends Pure CSS from Yahoo! for most people. In the question“What are the best fully-featured responsive CSS frameworks?” Pure CSS from Yahoo! is ranked 9th while Ink is ranked 10th. The most important reason people chose Pure CSS from Yahoo! is:
Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Also supports JavaScript
Ink is also a JavaScript framework.
Pro Awesome documentation
Ink has a awesome documentation about everything.
Pro Easy to customize
Has an extremely minimalist look that is super-easy to customize since it basically gives designers just a foundation on which they can easily build their design.
Pro Cross-Browser compatibility
A solid base built on Normalize.css to fix cross-browser compatibility issues.
Pro Lightweight
Extremely small file size: 4.5KB minified + gzip.
Pro Responsive
A responsive grid that can be customized to your needs.
Pro Works well with Bootstrap
Easily use Bootstrap CSS and JS elements within the framework.
Cons
Con Not suitable for beginners
Since Pure CSS only carries a minimum number of styles out of the box, it might not be great for beginners who want a complete style that looks good out of the box without having to customize it.