When comparing Jim Sterling vs Worth A Buy, the Slant community recommends Worth A Buy for most people. In the question“Who are the best game critics? ” Worth A Buy is ranked 6th while Jim Sterling is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Worth A Buy is:
Worth A Buy does not cater to saying what people want to hear but says what he thinks no matter the blowback he may receive. While not always stating something many will agree with it is refreshing to hear someone unafraid to state their opinion when they know it may be unpopular.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Not afraid to speak his mind
Jim Sterling is known for stepping on toes once in a while. In 2009 he gave Assassin's Creed II a 4 our of 10 when most reviewers praised the game, he heavily criticised Peter Molyneyx, a respected industry figure, for constantly overselling and under-delivering his games and manipulating the consumers, etc.
Pro Pro-consumer attitude
Jim Sterling has criticised Valve's Steam Greenlight for having a lack of quality control, multiple developers of "asset flipping" (presenting ready-made game engine assets as a game), the mainstream media for portraying games as causing violence, etc.
Pro Thank God for Him
Pro Honest reviews even if the opinion is not popular
Worth A Buy does not cater to saying what people want to hear but says what he thinks no matter the blowback he may receive. While not always stating something many will agree with it is refreshing to hear someone unafraid to state their opinion when they know it may be unpopular.
Pro Covers early access and alpha/beta material on the scope of being a full paid product
Worth A Buy covers many early access and alpha/beta products as just that, products and then rviews these titles on if they are currently worth the money being asked. This can be refreshing to hear if an EA game is actually worth the current price for what is on offer instead of hearing about intended promises that may or may not make the final release.
Cons
Con Can be seen as overly hostile
As Sterling has a tendency to cover (often touchy) topics in a somewhat inflammatory, unapologetic manner, he often gets perceived as being needlessly hostile.
Con Is little more than a populist rabble rouser
Whatever gamers are upset about this week, expect the Jimquisition to be following along promptly with a preachy, whiny summation of things everyone said already.
Con Some people may see the reviews as too harsh
Many people may not agree with the reviewers stance on outing certain tactics in the gaming development community, which can be a turn off in watching.