When comparing Pyramid vs Falcon, the Slant community recommends Pyramid for most people. In the question“What are the best general-purpose Python web frameworks usable in production sites?” Pyramid is ranked 5th while Falcon is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Pyramid is:
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Very flexible
Pyramid can be used for creating small applications quickly and easily, but it also powers up large enterprise-scale applications such as Dropbox.
Pro Persistence agnostic
Either NoSQL and SQL (including SQLAlchemy plugin).
Pro Comes with security included
Includes authorization and authentication with multiple backends.
Pro Built to build REST APIs
Falcon is designed entirely around building REST APIs. It achieves this helps a lot with it being lightweight and simple. It also helps developers take some design choices which would otherwise not be possible with a more general-purpose framework,
Pro Lightweight with minimal dependencies
Falcon is a very lightweight framework. This can be noticed simply by looking at the dependency list: other than the python standard library, six and mimeparse are the only dependencies.
Pro Performance is really awesome
Cons
Con The great number of options it offers can become intimidating
One of Pyramid's greatest drawbacks is that it requires a lot of set up in the beginning of a project. This can feel overwhelming and can keep people away from using it.
Con Limited in scope
Being designed around building REST APIs and the fact that it's minimalistic with very few dependencies makes Falcon opinionated (you should build a REST API) and limited in scope (you shouldn't be using Falcon to build a news site, blog or ecommerce platform).
