When comparing Rune Classic vs Battlefield 4, the Slant community recommends Battlefield 4 for most people. In the question“What are the best LAN party PC games?” Battlefield 4 is ranked 59th while Rune Classic is ranked 121st. The most important reason people chose Battlefield 4 is:
Each level in the multiplayer section of the game has fully destructible elements, meaning that a certain area of a level can be opened up to new tactics due to a missing structure. This keeps the strategy of each game fully immersive as things can change on the fly.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Terrific melee multiplayer
You can cut off arms and heads and use them as weapons.
Pro Complexity makes the game challenging and interesting
Each weapon plays uniquely - some are better at quick jabs and some are better at broad strokes. You can completely change up combat by switching up weapons, which means there is a lot more to learn.
Pro Immersive destruction that can change gameplay
Each level in the multiplayer section of the game has fully destructible elements, meaning that a certain area of a level can be opened up to new tactics due to a missing structure. This keeps the strategy of each game fully immersive as things can change on the fly.
Pro 64 Players Mode
Cons
Con Poor single player
The single-player is more of a tutorial for multiplayer than a full campaign.
Con Poor writing in campaign mode
The story in the campaign mode is pretty lacking and never fully fleshes out the characters contained within. It can be difficult to care about what is going on, which is a disappointment as there is little reason to continue forward as far as the story is concerned.