Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Programmer Dvorak vs Carpalx QGMLWY, the Slant community recommends Programmer Dvorak for most people. In the question“What are the best keyboard layouts for programming?” Programmer Dvorak is ranked 2nd while Carpalx QGMLWY is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Programmer Dvorak is:
J and K are where C and V are on QWERTY. H is still left of L.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Vim keybindings still make sense
J and K are where C and V are on QWERTY. H is still left of L.
Pro Made for programming
This keyboard took a stand and optimized the Dvorak standard for programming.
Pro Easy to learn if you're already used to Dvorak
The letter keys are the same, so it's not nearly the same mental jump as Qwerty to Dvorak.
Pro Keyboards are designed for human comfort
Pro Programmer punctuation without shifting on the top row
The top row is hardest to reach, and shifting doesn't make this easier. Programmers uses punctuation far more than numerals, so it makes sense to shift for the numerals instead of the punctuation.
Pro Preinstalled on Linux
You can enable it systemwide when you're installing Ubuntu.
Pro Open source
The keyboard layout is open source and available for edition.
Pro Typing feels more comfortable
Completely subjective of course.
Pro Easily switch between Standard Dvorak and Programmer's one
Dvorak Simplified Layout is more general and available on all OS, if we need to type on other's computer, we can still use the Dvorak Simplified Layout for typing.
Pro Better number arrangement
The smallest numerals are the most frequently used, so why should they be on the weak fingers of the left hand? The order still makes sense too. Odd numbers on the left, even numbers on the right, ascending from the inside out (with the least used numeral '9' in the middle).
Pro Don't need to buy another keyboard or move keycaps around
Having the original QWERTY labels is useful for other people using your computer or if you ever need QWERTY. Not having keycaps labeled in Dvorak forces you to learn to touch type. All QWERTY keyboards can be remapped to Dvorak in your operating system settings, so you don't need a physical Dvorak keyboards.
Pro Number arrangement is the same as the original Dvorak keyboards
Pro More use means more usage
If an individual uses this and tells other people or they try it, the layout will be more popular, and those people will tell people and the world will change.
Pro Other people can't use your computer unless you switch it to QWERTY for them
Pro Easier to learn than QGMLWB
Keeps the ZXCV key in the same place as the very common QWERTY keyboard layout. More familiar than even than QGMLWB.
Pro The layout is basically good for most Latin languages
As vowels and consonants are mostly divided between 2 hands and most words in Latin languages are made of 2-letter (consonant+vowel) syllables, the layout keeps it efficiency not only in English, for which it was primarily created, but in other languages too.
Pro It takes much less effort to type than classical layout
The layout effectively combines not only changing hands methods, and rolling fingers as well, that makes typing a real pleasure.
Pro About the same score on the carplax test as the QGMLWB variant
See the source here.
Cons
Con Other people can't use your computer unless you switch it to QWERTY for them
Con Keyboard controls for video games and other applications are all made for QWERTY
If you want to game, the WASD keys are completely unusable. You either need to switch to QWERTY (and then switch to Dvorak every time you want to use in game chat) or spend time remaping every key, because games don't come with Dvorak keymaps. Sufficiently popular games might have Dvorak mods.
Con It takes a couple weeks before you're back to a usable speed when switching from QWERTY
Achieving your old QWERTY speed can take a month or more.
Con Dvorak users usually still use QWERTY on their smartphones
Dvorak is made for ten fingers. Its main ideas, such as maximizing the number of "finger rolls" and alternating hands, don't make much sense when you're typing with your thumbs.
Con SHORTCUTS nightmare
Shortcuts, Shortcuts, Shortcuts, it is a total nightmare for users even used it for years.
Con Typing numbers is hard
Numbers are arranged for their characters, not in ascending order. You also have to shift.
Con It probably won't make you type much faster, if at all
Con Punctuation moved, not just letters
Punctuation moved in addition to letters, meaning that the learning curve is that much harder coming from QWERTY because nearly every key is in a different place.
Con Very unpopular
Even rich on keyboard layouts variety Linux distros like Deepin, offering most of existing layouts, doesn't have this one. The situation on Android is not better, moreover if somebody get used to Swift-like keyboards, that do not have this layout, that person will be forced to have a second (e.g. qwerty) layout in mind.
Con Not always worth trying
The layout is great only if somebody uses it daily and a lot, like journalists, bloggers, writers do. In this case inconvenience to install the layout is worth use it. If you primarily use your phone/tablet to write some comments in Internet and other tiny writing tasks having such an unpopular layout on just your PC/laptop could be not justified.
