Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing Falkon vs QtWeb, the Slant community recommends Falkon for most people. In the question“What are the best lightweight web browsers?” Falkon is ranked 11th while QtWeb is ranked 17th.
Specs
Based OnQupZilla
Browser EngineQt WebEngine (Blink)
Default Search EngineDuckDuckGo
LicenseOpenSource (GPLv3)
No specs yet!
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
No other questions
Pros
Pro Developed by KDE
Pro Lightweight
Pro Free and Open Source
GPLv3 license.
Pro Despite its very small size, it is self-contained: it does not depend on IE
Pro Windows version available in installer and portable (zip) formats
Pro Very lightweight with minimal system requirements
Pro Very small download
Windows: installer ~8MB; portable (zip) ~7.4MB
Pro Available for different operating systems
Windows, Linux, Unix and MacOS X.
Cons
Con Now under the KDE umbrella
Qupzilla is now discontinued and renamed to Falkon. It will also now be a part of KDE and will probably need more dependencies like kde-frameworks in the future.
Con Weak multimedia support
It has some issues with multimedia content eg. Non-playing videos on webpages.
Con Bookmark management not the strongest part
It often requires quite a lot of clicks to add and remove bookmarks.
Con Linux-only
Con Nobody uses it
Con It's not in active development
Last version (3.8.5) was released on Sep 9, 2013.
