When comparing Underscore Templates vs squirrelly, the Slant community recommends Underscore Templates for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript templating engines?” Underscore Templates is ranked 7th while squirrelly is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Underscore Templates is:
Due to Underscore's optimized performance and ease-of-use it can be deemed as most fit for use in small sections of your code, where you just want a quick and simple template to render your content.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro For micro templating
Due to Underscore's optimized performance and ease-of-use it can be deemed as most fit for use in small sections of your code, where you just want a quick and simple template to render your content.
Pro Pre-compilation
Underscore allows you to compile your template once before data is inserted to it.
Pro Blazing Fast
In most templating benchmarks, Squirrelly equals or outperforms the speed of other templating engines.
Pro Rich and customizable features
Squirrelly supports custom helpers, partials, and filters.
Pro Not language-bound
Squirrelly isn't tied to a specific language, like HTML. That means that you can use it to generate files of all kinds, from Markdown to JavaScript to SVGs.
Pro No whitespace worries
Squirrelly is not whitespace sensitive.
Pro Super simple
Squirrelly has syntax like Mustache or Swig, and you can write your first template in a few minutes! It also works with ExpressJS right out of the box.
Cons
Con Not a true templating engine
template
in underscore is simply a function which compiles a piece of template into HTML. It's useful for rendering HTML from JSON and it's not very useful when building complex frontend templates.