When comparing NETGEAR Trek N300 vs TL-WR802N, the Slant community recommends NETGEAR Trek N300 for most people. In the question“What is the best Wi-Fi range extender?” NETGEAR Trek N300 is ranked 2nd while TL-WR802N is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose NETGEAR Trek N300 is:
It has a micro-USB port and since it only needs 100 volts to power up, you can plug it into a PC or laptop if there are no other energy sources available nearby.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can be powered by a PC
It has a micro-USB port and since it only needs 100 volts to power up, you can plug it into a PC or laptop if there are no other energy sources available nearby.
Pro Great for people who use public connections often
The built-in firewall that makes this router a very secure choice for connecting to public WiFis.
Pro Software is easy to use
Android tablet users will be happy to learn that there is a companion application for using this travel router with these devices, making setup a breeze.
Pro You just need to plug an Ethernet cable for it to start working
You can configure it once with a specific SSID and password and then just plug an Ethernet cable every time you need a wireless connection.
Pro Can be used as a repeater to strengthen a wireless connection
When you use the repeater function, the LAN/WAN is disconnected and the port is used only to rebroadcast the existing wireless signal. The WiFi antenna is quite powerful as well, so this router will probably be able to pick up signals that your phone does not.
Pro Can be charged by most USB cables
Has a microUSB port that is used for charging. This way you can connect it to most phone chargers if you lose the cable that comes with the router.
Pro Extremely portable
It measures only 2.2 x 2.2 x 0.7 inches and it's very light at only 7.2 ounces, making it easy to carry around even in your pocket.
Cons
Con Rather exensive
At $159.99 it's quite on the expensive side as far as mini-routers go.
Con Doesn't really support Gigabit Ethernet
Even though the LAN/WAN port technically supports Gigabit Ethernet, the speed will still be bottlenecked by the 300 Mbps throughput.