When comparing NETGEAR Trek N300 vs PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900), the Slant community recommends PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900) for most people. In the question“What are the best wifi-routers?” PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900) is ranked 3rd while NETGEAR Trek N300 is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose PHICOMM K3C (AC-1900) is:
Easy and stable.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Can be powered by a PC
It has a micro-USB port and since it only needs 100 volts to power up, you can plug it into a PC or laptop if there are no other energy sources available nearby.
Pro Great for people who use public connections often
The built-in firewall that makes this router a very secure choice for connecting to public WiFis.
Pro Software is easy to use
Android tablet users will be happy to learn that there is a companion application for using this travel router with these devices, making setup a breeze.
Pro Can use open wrt and asus router firmware
Easy and stable.
Con Rather exensive
At $159.99 it's quite on the expensive side as far as mini-routers go.
Con No support at all
There was no site you can get support, files etc, besides only one in Germany. This means no more updates.
Con Poor Firewall settings
The firewall only offers a few switchable on/off settings like DOS, Flooding and Ping from WAN. Not allowing filter acess to LAN etc.
Con Poor Parental Control
The Parental Control only filter access from devices by MAC address at specifics times, not allowing to block specific sites. If someone brings a new device, it can access whatever they want, easily bypassing the security.
Con Can't change the timezone
The region combo box is dimmed, so you can't chance the country (fixed at US). Even the time zone field selection is from GMT-6 to GMT-10.