When comparing Quasar Framework vs Dojo Toolkit, the Slant community recommends Dojo Toolkit for most people. In the question“What are the best open source JavaScript GUI/widget frameworks? ” Dojo Toolkit is ranked 3rd while Quasar Framework is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose Dojo Toolkit is:
Dojo Toolkit is a highly modular framework. It uses AMD modules and the module system is extremely powerful and easy to learn.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Uses Vue.js 2.0
Vue 3.x available as a plugin.
Pro Good documentation and coding samples
Pro Massive suite of well test & optimized widgets
Instant rebuild for SPA, PWA, Cordova or Electron with Material/iOS Themes.
Pro Designed from the outset for desktop & mobile
Pro Can build/test your PWA with/without PWA wrapper
Pro Supports server side rendering (SSR) like Nuxt + SSR/PWA
"Icon genie" builds app icons and splash images for platforms selected.
Pro Ability to add custom server side code when using SSR
Pro Highly modular
Dojo Toolkit is a highly modular framework. It uses AMD modules and the module system is extremely powerful and easy to learn.
Pro Consistent and complete
Pro Not only web apps
Dojo is not used only for web development. The widgets featured in Dojo can also be used to create mobile user interfaces.
Cons
Con Developed by a single person
Statistically, apps being developed by a single person can be gone without warning.
Con Not able to keep up with the future of the web
The web is moving towards web components, something that Dojo does not implement. In its current state Dojo badly needs more abstraction and it also needs to provide some form of modern application architecture.
Con Integrated first-party loader makes interoperability extremely difficult
Con No startup-function
When the dojo-javascript is loaded, it will directly run the application. No chance to intercept with the options